Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Nuclear Power, Anyone?

It's time to turn to nuclear power and to spend the vast sums of money that are required to upgrade our decades old, and in some parts century old, electrical power grid to modern capacities. Otherwise, we are going to be hearing more and more about power failures and blackouts in Queens, St. Louis, and Los Angeles. Burning fossil fuels is so 1800s. It's time to make the leap into the 21st country or we'll be reading more articles like this one from the New York Times about Los Angeles:
Unrelenting tropical heat and humidity has driven demand for electricity to record highs in California and other states. If people could not take the weather anymore, neither could transformers and other equipment, which sputtered and shorted out and left tens of thousands of people without power today.

Authorities in California warned that the high demand could lead later this afternoon to an emergency order for rolling blackouts, a dreaded term here that brings reminders of widespread blackouts in 2003 during an energy supply crisis.
and St. Louis:
Meanwhile, lighting from thunderstorms have compounded problems in other parts of the country, leaving more than 200,000 people in the St. Louis area without electricity since Wednesday. Utility officials in Missouri said they expected to restore power to most customers by the middle of the week.
That's right, the headlines about record temperatures are everywhere and our desire for 68 degree interior temperatures just won't be satisfied with ever growing populations, rising prices of oil, and antiquated energy provisions. We're well on into the time when we should be determining how to supply our needs domestically and pollution-free nuclear is the key.

1 Comments:

At 3:58 PM, Blogger Xavier Alexander said...

The fact that the US and the world is so reliant on fossil fuels is simply amazing to me...especially when technology all around us is improving at moore's law rates. Why are we and the world so slow at innovation in energy? It all has to do with economics. As long as fossil fuels remain the most cost effective source of energy, they will remain. Entrepreneurship, r&d, and risk are only taken when there is reward and in business that means money. This is where our government has to step out and do more to entice r&d and risk takers, by offering more tax benefits that promote other forms of energy. That said the government should not be giving preferential treatment to types of energy but rather to outcome. Give money for outcomes, and ingenutive people will figure out the rest. By outcome in this case I mean pollution levels. The federal government could offer payments to states that are able to lower pollution levels for example.

 

Post a Comment

<< Return to The Realist Party Home Page